Case 3312737/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Saunders v Bauer Consumer Media Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312737/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ORD Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Saunders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been received from Bauer Consumer Media Ltd, the tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and found that Mrs S Saunders had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex and maternity as alleged in the claim form presented on 23 October 2020. The judgment did not determine remedy at that stage.
A further hearing to decide remedy was listed for 29 April 2021 at Cambridge Employment Tribunal. To assist that hearing, the tribunal ordered the claimant to file and serve a schedule of financial losses, a witness statement setting out the facts and the acts of discrimination relied on for injury to feelings, witness statements from any other witnesses, and any medical evidence relied on for injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Found by default judgment under Rule 21 after no response was received; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Found by default judgment under Rule 21 after no response was received; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.