Case 3312741/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Alcroft v DX Network Services Ltd v — 2020
- Case reference
- 3312741/2019
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Appearances
- Venue
- Via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Alcroft
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard via CVP on 16 and 17 November 2020 before Employment Judge Milner-Moore. The claimant, Mr Stephen Alcroft, appeared in person and the respondent, DX Network Services Ltd, was represented by Ms Nicholls of counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the only recorded claim, holding that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons for that conclusion.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record records only the dispositive finding that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. It does not set out the tribunal's reasons beyond noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.