Case 3312806/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Doherty v Surrey Choices — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312806/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Doherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 June 2023, Employment Judge A Jack heard Miss G Doherty v Surrey Choices by video at Watford. In case 3300090/2023, the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
In case 3312806/2022, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was submitted out of time and that the claimant had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the normal time limit. The claim was therefore struck out because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it.
The disability discrimination claim in case 3312806/2022 was also submitted out of time. The tribunal found that the claimant had not shown it would be just and equitable to extend time, and that claim was likewise struck out. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Case 3300090/2023: the judgment records dismissal following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Case 3300090/2023: the judgment records dismissal following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Case 3312806/2022: the claim was presented out of time and the claimant did not show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the normal time limit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Case 3312806/2022: the claim was presented out of time and the claimant did not show that it would be just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.