Case 3312829/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sillion Andrews v Shift 4 Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312829/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew Clarke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sillion Andrews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Andrew Clarke KC, heard by telephone on 5 June 2023. The claimant was Ms Sillion Andrews and the respondent was Shift 4 Limited. No lay members were listed, and the written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no further written reasons were provided.
The only claim determined in the record was a claim for constructive unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal dismissed that claim because the claimant did not have the required two years' qualifying service.
No remedy was awarded, and the record does not identify any separate monetary figures. The judgment is a short preliminary decision on eligibility rather than a substantive merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because the claimant lacked the required two years' qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.