Case 3312832/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stuart Terblanche v Fibre First Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312832/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stuart Terblanche
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Norwich by CVP on 26 May 2023, before Employment Judge Liz Ord, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his notice pay claim, and that claim was withdrawn.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,692.32, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his claim for notice pay, and it was therefore withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,692.32, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,692
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.