Case 3312833/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Di Rosa v Gardarica Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312833/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Di Rosa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, made because the time limit for presenting a response expired on 31 August 2021 and no response was presented. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto determined the case on the available material and made findings in the claimant's favour on each of the pleaded money claims.
The tribunal found that Gardarica Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr R Di Rosa's wages and ordered it to pay £794.40 gross/net. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,288.32.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £942.31. The judgment records no separate award of basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings, and the total monetary award is the sum of the three orders made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £794.40 gross/net. | Upheld | — | £794 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,288.32. | Upheld | — | £2,288 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £942.31. | Upheld | — | £942 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,025
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.