Case 3312873/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Henderson Cook v Paul Gurley t/a Newfolk Inns Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312873/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Henderson Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Norwich Employment Tribunals on 6 July 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge proceeded to determine the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No live defence or hearing issues are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £147.50 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £371.70. The extracted judgment does not record any further reasoning, split of awards beyond those two sums, or any additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £147.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £148 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £371.70. | Upheld | — | £372 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.