Case 3312874/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Frosdick v Paul Gurley t/a Newfolk Inns Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312874/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Frosdick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Norwich Employment Tribunals on 6 July 2021. The respondent, Paul Gurley t/a Newfolk Inns Ltd, failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr L Frosdick £563.09 gross. The judgment does not identify any split between different heads of remedy or record any additional award beyond that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £563.09 gross. | Upheld | — | £563 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £563
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.