Case 3312875/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Maria Keep v First Greater Western Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312875/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Maria Keep
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that, to the extent the claimant's sex discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination and disability discrimination complaints had been presented out of time, they were brought within such further period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. The tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to consider those complaints.
The claimant then withdrew all of her direct discrimination claims. Following that withdrawal, those claims were dismissed. The written judgment contains no merits findings on the substance of the discrimination allegations and makes no award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew her direct discrimination claims and that they were then dismissed. A just and equitable extension of time was granted to the extent any sex discrimination complaint was out of time. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew her direct discrimination claims and that they were then dismissed. A just and equitable extension of time was granted to the extent any sexual orientation discrimination complaint was out of time. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew her direct discrimination claims and that they were then dismissed. A just and equitable extension of time was granted to the extent any disability discrimination complaint was out of time. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.