Case 3312895/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Not present or represented For the v Mr Steve Hobbs, director. — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312895/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Not present or represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the 19 May 2022 hearing, but the tribunal proceeded in his absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after refusing an adjournment application. The respondent, represented by its director Mr Steve Hobbs, accepted that sums were due if the claimant was found to be a worker, although it maintained that he had been engaged on a self-employed basis and referred to alleged flood damage at the premises.
The tribunal found that the claimant was a worker within the meaning of section 13(1) ERA 1996 and within the meaning of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found that he had worked from the first week of March 2021 until 1 June 2021 doing depot maintenance, that he supplied his own tools, and that he was paid £10 per hour, or £65 for a full day after an unpaid one-and-a-half-hour lunch break. The tribunal also recorded that the question of statutory sick pay was outside its jurisdiction.
On remedy, the tribunal held that the claimant had received no holiday pay and was entitled to 7 days' pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated as a quarter of the annual 28-day entitlement. That produced an award of £455. It also found that the claimant had not been paid for 31 May 2021 and 1 June 2021, amounting to 7.25 hours at £10 per hour, or £72.50. The total award was therefore £527.50 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Tribunal held the claimant was a worker within the Working Time Regulations 1998 and had received no holiday pay. It awarded 7 days' holiday pay, calculated as a quarter of the annual 28-day entitlement. | Upheld | — | £455 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claimant had not been paid for work done on 31 May 2021 and 1 June 2021. It accepted that no £90 deduction had been made, but held the respondent still owed 7.25 hours' wages at £10 per hour. | Upheld | — | £73 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £528
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.