Case 3312906/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mistri v Top Maintenance Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312906/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mistri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response, and Employment Judge Alliott entered judgment under Rule 21 on 18 March 2021. The decision was sent to the parties on 22 March 2021.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £720.00. It also found that the respondent had failed to give the claimant a written statement of particulars of employment and ordered payment of £720.00, described in the judgment as two weeks' wages. The total amount recorded by the judgment is £1,440.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Other | The judgment orders £720.00, described as two weeks' wages, for failure to give the claimant a written statement of particulars of employment. The judgment does not use a separate legal label for this order. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,440
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.