Case 3312917/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Wilkinson v Animal Health Trust (In Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3312917/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment dated 12 March 2021, sent to the parties on 29 March 2021, in which Employment Judge R Lewis recorded that the claim succeeds. The tribunal also stated that the remedy to which Miss A Wilkinson is entitled would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
The extracted text does not set out the underlying facts, identify any separate liability findings, or allocate the result between individual complaints. It also does not record any monetary award, which was left for the Remedy Hearing. The case listing provided for this extraction describes the jurisdiction as breach of contract and working time regulations, but the short judgment itself does not break the outcome down further.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short Rule 21 judgment says the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. The extracted text does not separate the heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short Rule 21 judgment says the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. The extracted text does not separate the heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.