Case 3312924/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Brown v Kingsley Care Homes Limited Heard: Norwich by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312924/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Paul Brown brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages and unfair dismissal against Kingsley Care Homes Limited. At the hearing in Norwich by CVP on 10 February 2022, Employment Judge M Warren recorded that the unlawful deduction of wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal because the amount claimed had been paid by the respondent.
The tribunal also found that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the judgment record, so the decision contains no further findings on liability or remedy beyond the brief outcome stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal because the amount claimed had been paid by the respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.