Case 3312949/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Giles v Mussett Aerospace Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312949/2023
- Decision date
- 16 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Giles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 December 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore dismissed or struck out the claims. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims were made in the extracted judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded heads of claim in the extracted text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded heads of claim in the extracted text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.