Case 3312953/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Servais v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312953/2023
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
- Venue
- Watford Tribunal
- Panel members
- Ms C Bailey, Ms F Betts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Servais
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, sex discrimination and race discrimination in their entirety. The respondent had applied for strike out on the basis that the claimant had failed to comply with Tribunal orders, failed to pursue the claim, and later that a fair hearing could no longer take place.
The Tribunal found that there had been total non-compliance with the orders made on 11 July 2024. It noted the claimant's caring responsibilities and explanations relating to bereavement and the illness of her solicitor, but concluded that the evidence did not show there had been no opportunity to comply with the orders or give instructions over the period in question.
The Tribunal accepted that the case could not be fairly heard on 12 May 2025 and concluded that, after significant delay and with the parties not ready for the final hearing, it was no longer likely that a fair trial could occur. It considered lesser sanctions, including costs or an unless order, but found they would not be sufficient or practical, and struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was struck out as part of the claim being struck out in its entirety. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim was struck out as part of the claim being struck out in its entirety. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination claim was struck out as part of the claim being struck out in its entirety. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38(c) and (d)
- rule 38(e)
- overriding objective at r3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.