Case 3312956/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312956/2021
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Norwich on 1 March 2022, before Employment Judge Postle, the tribunal determined two claims brought by Mrs J Heti against Country Retirement and Nursing Homes Ltd, a subsidiary of Kingsley Healthcare. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant's notice pay claim was not well founded. It also held that the claimant's claim for accrued holiday pay was well founded.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant for 10.5 days' accrued holiday, amounting to £850. No separate award was recorded for notice pay, and no other remedy components were identified in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant's notice pay claim was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's accrued holiday pay claim was found well founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay 10.5 days accrued holiday amounting to £850. | Upheld | — | £850 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £850
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.