Case 3312962/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Boscoe v Nationwide Crash Repair Centre Ltd (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312962/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Boscoe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a determination on the papers with no attendance by either party. The tribunal found that Mr Boscoe had been employed by the respondent at its Warrington site and that his circumstances were the same as those of claimants covered by an earlier protective award judgment in lead case number 2415501/2020.
For those reasons, the tribunal made a protective award in Mr Boscoe's favour and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 4 September 2020. The judge recorded that the decision was made for the same reasons as the earlier judgments and noted that any party who considered Mr Boscoe not entitled to a protective award could apply for reconsideration.
The tribunal made no order for costs or fees, so each party was to bear their own costs and fees. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were stated to apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal made a protective award in favour of the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 4 September 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.