Case 3312986/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Poynton v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312986/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Poynton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis, sitting alone, heard the case at Reading by CVP on 9 July 2021. The claimant was represented by Mr S Morris and the respondent by Miss A Leach, solicitor.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims are dismissed. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states only that the claimant's claims are dismissed; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.