Case 3312992/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Natalie Spencer, Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312992/2021
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's claim against Linecross Limited was struck out because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. The tribunal accepted that it was not reasonably practicable for the complaints to be presented before the end of the relevant three-month period, but found that the claimant did not present them within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
The hearing was before Employment Judge Tynan sitting alone at Cambridge on 22 February 2022. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would follow unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim for lack of jurisdiction because, although it accepted it was not reasonably practicable for the complaints to be presented before the end of the three-month period, the claim was not then presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- such further period as the Tribunal considers reasonable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.