Case 3312995/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Ksiazek v Grand Union Pub Company Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312995/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Ksiazek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 24 June 2021 before Employment Judge Michell, the claimant appeared in person with assistance from his daughter and the respondent appeared through its director. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s claims because they were brought out of time.
The written judgment lists claims for unfair dismissal, arrears of pay, non-payment of holiday pay and notice pay. All were dismissed on limitation grounds, and the tribunal made no substantive findings on liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim dismissed because it was brought out of time; the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to arrears of pay; dismissed because it was brought out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to non-payment of holiday pay; dismissed because it was brought out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to notice pay; dismissed because it was brought out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.