Case 3312996/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Emma Bunn v Ms Polly Aitken trading as Lingwood Kindergarten — 2024
- Case reference
- 3312996/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Emma Bunn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Emma Bunn presented a claim for a statutory redundancy payment after early conciliation. Ms Polly Aitken, trading as Lingwood Kindergarten, accepted that she had employed the claimant and that the employment ended when the kindergarten closed suddenly in or about March 2023. The only issue raised was the calculation of the redundancy payment, including length of service and the relevant weekly pay.
The tribunal found that the facts were agreed. It accepted the claimant’s evidence, supported by P60s, that employment began on 1 June 2006, and found that the employment ended on 29 March 2023 when it was clear that the kindergarten was unlikely to reopen for some time. On that basis, the tribunal found that the employment ended by reason of redundancy and that the claim was presented within time as extended by early conciliation.
The tribunal found that the claimant had 16 full years of continuous service at the date of termination. It accepted that she worked 35 hours a week during term time, excluding an unpaid 20 minute break, and that she was paid the National Living Wage of £9.50 per hour. It therefore found her weekly pay to be £332.50 and held that weeks outside term time could be discounted for the purposes of calculating a statutory redundancy payment.
Applying the statutory formula under section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was entitled to 15 weeks’ pay. The opening reserved judgment records the redundancy payment as £4,987.50, although paragraph 12 of the reasons contains a different figure of £4,978.50 while also stating the calculation as 15 x £332.50.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The opening reserved judgment states that the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,987.50. Paragraph 12 of the reasons states £4,978.50, but it also says the calculation is 15 x £332.50, which aligns with £4,987.50. | Upheld | — | £4,988 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,988
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 162(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 223(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 164 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.