Case 3313003/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313003/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an application for interim relief heard at Bury St Edmunds on 3 January 2024 before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone. The claimant, Mr Muhibar Rahman, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr D Piddington.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed. The extracted text does not state the underlying substantive claim or any factual findings beyond the dismissal of the interim relief application.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent. The decision was sent to the parties on 25 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the underlying substantive claim is not stated in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.128 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.