Case 3313035/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Davey as Personal Representative in the Estate of Mr Evan Innis v Facebook UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313035/2021
- Decision date
- 16 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Davey as Personal Representative in the Estate of Mr Evan Innis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment on whether the Tribunal could hear the unfair dismissal claim, which had been presented out of time. The Claimant, Ms J Davey as personal representative of the estate of Mr Evan Innis, applied for an extension of time under s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996. The application was not resisted by the Respondent, Facebook UK Ltd.
Employment Judge O’Rourke accepted the explanation for the delay. The judgment records that the case was exceptional because the person on whose behalf the claim was brought was deceased and his widow, acting as personal representative, had been dealing with the aftermath of his presumed suicide. The Tribunal also accepted that she had not had the benefit of professional legal advice from the outset and was unaware of the requirements of s.206 ERA as to becoming administrator of the estate or applying to the Tribunal under s.206(4).
The reasons note that an initial claim was submitted in February 2021 in her own name, but that this was invalid because she could not then comply with s.206. After taking professional advice in April 2021, she applied for letters of administration and received them on 5 July 2021, then issued the present claim a week later. The Tribunal concluded that it had not been reasonably practicable to bring the unfair dismissal claim within the three-month limit and that it was brought within such further period as was reasonable.
The result was that the Tribunal accepted jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. No merits determination or monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary jurisdiction decision only. The Tribunal extended time under s.111 ERA 1996 and held that it had jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim; it did not determine the merits. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.206 Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable / further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.