Case 3313045/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hardy v Refined Coachworks Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313045/2021
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Hardy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant presented his claim on 13 July 2021 after Acas early conciliation between 6 and 9 July 2021. He said he was owed unpaid wages for work done in June 2021 before resigning on 23 June 2021, and also said he was owed pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday. The Respondent did not present a Response within the 28-day period and did not dispute the Claimant's account or calculations.
The Claimant provided a payslip showing gross basic monthly pay of £2,500, which the Tribunal noted equated to £576.92 per week or £115.38 per day. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted that 16 days' unpaid wages were due in the sum of £1,846.14. It also accepted the Claimant's calculation that five days of accrued but untaken holiday remained outstanding at termination, valued at £576.92.
The Tribunal declared that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,423.06. The judgment states that the total is subject to PAYE deductions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant said he had 16 days of unpaid wages for work done in June 2021 before his resignation on 23 June 2021. The Respondent did not dispute that there were 16 days' unpaid wages, and the Tribunal accepted the Claimant's calculation based on a daily rate of £115.38. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
| Holiday pay | The Claimant also claimed payment for five days of accrued but untaken holiday at termination. The Respondent did not dispute this head of claim, and the Tribunal accepted the Claimant's calculation based on the same daily rate. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,423
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.