Case 3313063/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Maseke v Telefonica UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313063/2021
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Maseke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's holiday pay complaint in claim 3322993/2021 was dismissed upon withdrawal. The claimant's age discrimination complaints in claims 3306767/2021 and 3322993/2021 were also dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal struck out the complaints in claim forms 3313063/2021 and 3322993/2021, finding that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaints set out. The written judgment records the outcome only and states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay complaint in claim 3322993/2021 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination complaints in claims 3306767/2021 and 3322993/2021 were dismissed upon withdrawal. It does not identify an age discrimination complaint in claim 3313063/2021. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the complaints in claim forms 3313063/2021 and 3322993/2021 were struck out because the employment tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaints set out. The written judgment does not specify the legal categories of those complaints. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.