Case 3313075/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Darren Trimble v Bash HR and Admin Services Ltd and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313075/2023
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Darren Trimble
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing heard on 6 March 2025 by Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone. The claimant, Darren Trimble, appeared in person. There was no appearance or representation for any respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the first respondent, Bash HR and Admin Services Ltd, had been dissolved. In light of that dissolution, the first respondent was removed from the proceedings and the case was dismissed against it. The order did not determine the substantive employment claims, if any, as between the claimant and the remaining respondents.
The proceedings were expressly allowed to continue against the second and third respondents, Noordzee Holding Ltd and Shah Muqeem Developers (UK) Ltd. No remedy was awarded, and no merits findings were made in this preliminary record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal recorded that the first respondent had been dissolved, removed the first respondent from the proceedings, and dismissed the proceedings against it. The proceedings were to continue against the second and third respondents. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.