Case 3313098/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Csillag v The Workshop (Wisbech) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313098/2021
- Decision date
- 21 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Csillag
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 October 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 6 September 2022, had not actively pursued the claim, and had conducted the proceedings unreasonably.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Tynan struck out the claim on 21 March 2023. The judgment records no findings on the substance of the discrimination allegations and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment only records that the claim was struck out; the underlying claim type is inferred from the case listing and linked GOV.UK categories. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment only records that the claim was struck out; the underlying claim type is inferred from the case listing and linked GOV.UK categories. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.