Case 3313150/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. S Khokhar v Little Inventors Montessori Nurseries Ltd c/o Shweta Bahl — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313150/2020
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. S Khokhar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the papers after the respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade said the claim could properly be determined without a hearing on the basis of the ET1. The judgment records the respondent's correct name as Little Inventors Montessori Nurseries Ltd c/o Shweta Bahl.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages. No further factual analysis or separate legal reasoning is set out in the extracted text, and no additional claims are identified in the judgment text provided.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £17,946 and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that amount. The judgment does not break the sum down into separate heads of loss or record any award for interest.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent 'has unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages' and orders payment of £17,946. | Upheld | — | £17,946 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,946
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.