Mr S Biddulph v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 3313166/2020
Decision date: 16 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge JUDGMENT

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr S Biddulph

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal, dealing with the matter on the basis that no valid response had been presented in time, amended the respondent’s name to Adobe Estate Agents (Norwich) Limited. It then found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £342.60.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £936.93. It recorded that the total payable under the judgment, without deduction and taxable in the claimant’s hands, was £1,279.53.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £342.60.	Upheld	—	£343
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £936.93.	Upheld	—	£937

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,280; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.