Case 3313178/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr S Sozumert, Manager — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313178/2020
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloom Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent from 1 March 2019 until his resignation on 13 June 2020. He brought claims relating to holiday pay and deductions from salary for April and May 2020. The tribunal did not deal with the claimant's complaint about an exchange-rate issue in converting US dollars to sterling, and it told him that the HMRC tax issue was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction.
The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant only. The respondent, through Mr S Sozumert, was given the opportunity to give evidence or call witnesses but did not do so. On the balance of probabilities, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence. It found that he was paid £2,031.73 per month, was entitled to 43 days' holiday over the relevant period, had taken 10 days, and was owed 33 days' holiday pay. Using a daily rate of £78.12, it calculated holiday pay due at £2,577.96.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had suffered a 40% shortfall in salary for April 2020 and an 80% shortfall in salary for May 2020, and that he had not consented to those deductions. It held that those amounts were unlawful deductions of wages, calculated at £831.73 for April 2020 and £1,006.73 for May 2020.
The total amount payable was therefore £4,416.42, made up of £2,577.96 holiday pay, £831.73 for April 2020, and £1,006.73 for May 2020. The award was stated to be subject to any lawful deductions for tax and national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was owed 33 days holiday pay. It accepted the claimant's evidence, found a daily rate of £78.12, and calculated holiday pay due at £2,577.96. | Upheld | — | £2,578 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from salary for April 2020 and May 2020. It found a 40% shortfall in April 2020 (£831.73) and an 80% shortfall in May 2020 (£1,006.73), totalling £1,838.46. | Upheld | — | £1,838 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,416
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.