Case 3313194/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Anthonio v Tesco Stores plc Heard: Watford by CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313194/2022
- Decision date
- 30 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Anthonio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr E Anthonio's unfair dismissal claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge Codd recorded that the claim was struck out because the manner in which the litigation had been pursued by the claimant was unreasonable, because he had failed to comply with the tribunal's directions, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the dismissal complaint and records no monetary award. It is a strike-out decision only, with written reasons stated not to be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a strike-out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 rather than a merits determination. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37, Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.