Case 3313246/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ahmed Erujeje v Main Unit Location Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313246/2023
- Decision date
- 9 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ahmed Erujeje
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Young at Watford on 31 October and 1 November 2024. The written judgment records that the claim had not been presented within the applicable time limit, and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend that time limit. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The Tribunal also found that the Claimant was not an employee or worker of the Respondent at the relevant time. It therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to determine the claim, and dismissed it on that separate ground as well. The judgment does not set out any remedy because no claim succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The Tribunal dismissed the claim because it was presented out of time and because it found the Claimant was not an employee or worker of the Respondent at the relevant time, so it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.