In person For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 3313253/2019
Decision date: 24 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lang Members
Venue: Watford
Panel members: Mrs F Betts, Ms J Stewart

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal at Watford, consisting of Employment Judge Lang with lay members Mrs F Betts and Ms J Stewart, heard Mrs C Davies's claims against BMW (UK) Manufacturing Limited on 22 to 24 June 2021. The written record states that the complaint of detriment under s147 TULRCA 1992 was submitted out of time and was dismissed.

The tribunal also dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal under s152 TULRCA 1992 and s98 ERA 1996, finding it was not well founded. Reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that no written reasons would follow unless requested. No remedy was awarded because both complaints failed.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Complaint of detriment under s147 TULRCA 1992. The tribunal said it was submitted out of time.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Complaint of unfair dismissal under s152 TULRCA 1992 and s98 ERA 1996. The tribunal found it was not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.