Case 3313265/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Dillon v Strawberry Mama Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313265/2020
- Decision date
- 11 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Dillon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T Brown sat alone at Cambridge on 23 March 2022. The respondent, Strawberry Mama Limited, had no response accepted but was permitted to make submissions. The tribunal upheld the claimant Mrs E Dillon's complaint of breach of contract in relation to 14 hours' furlough pay and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £122.08, subject to any deductions for tax and National Insurance required by law.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's complaint that accrued and outstanding holiday pay had not been paid on termination. That claim was assessed at 23.73 hours, and the tribunal ordered compensation of £206.92, again subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance required by law. The written record states that reasons had been given orally on 23 March 2022 and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in relation to 14 hours' furlough pay; damages ordered subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance required by law. | Upheld | — | £122 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint of failure to pay accrued and outstanding holiday pay at termination, assessed as 23.73 hours; compensation ordered subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance required by law. | Upheld | — | £207 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £329
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.