Case 3313270/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Pooley v Bash HR And Admin Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313270/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Pooley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge R Lewis. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,279.25 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,080.77. The judgment was sent to the parties on 14 March 2024.
The judgment does not set out detailed reasons, reflecting its nature as a Rule 21 determination under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. Tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,279.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,279 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,080.77. | Upheld | — | £2,081 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,360
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.