Case 3313276/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cooper v Centrica plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313276/2019
- Decision date
- 25 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The judgment states that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
The tribunal found that, had the unfair dismissal not occurred, it was likely the claimant's employment would have ended by 25 February 2019. The compensatory award was therefore limited to the period between dismissal and 25 February 2019.
The tribunal also decided that it was not just and equitable to reduce compensation under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. No monetary remedy figures are set out in the written record of judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeds and that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Consolidation Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.