Case 3313331/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Sobo v The Adventure Learning Charity — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313331/2020
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Sobo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Sobo was employed as Chief Operating Officer from 23 May 2019 on a contract that provided for three months' written notice, a £50,000 salary and a £3,000 car allowance. The tribunal examined the respondent's emails of 27 April, 12 May, 25 June and 26 June 2020 and found that they were not sufficiently clear to tell a reasonable employee that his contract was being terminated. It held that the first clear and unambiguous notification of termination was the finance officer's letter of 12 August 2020, so the effective date of termination was 12 August 2020.
On that basis, the breach of contract claim for notice pay succeeded because the contractual notice period had not been given. The tribunal rejected the respondent's position that notice had run from 27 April, and it recorded that payment through 31 July 2020 did not cure the absence of proper notice. The judgment also found that the correspondence created uncertainty as to whether the role was ending or being changed, which meant it did not operate as effective contractual notice.
The unlawful deduction from wages claim for holiday pay also succeeded. On reconsideration under Rule 73, the tribunal concluded it had erred in law in calculating a new notice period and instead confined the award to compensation for the breach. The final award was £13,250 gross for three months' notice and £203.84 gross for holiday accrued between 31 July and 12 August 2020, replacing the earlier holiday figure of £1,208.06 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to 3 months' written notice under clause 4.1.2 and that the respondent's correspondence did not amount to clear notice of termination. Compensation was awarded at 3 months' pay, gross. | Upheld | — | £13,250 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay claim. The original figure of £1,208.06 gross was amended on reconsideration to £203.84 gross, being holiday accrued between 31 July 2020 and the effective date of termination on 12 August 2020. | Upheld | — | £204 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,454
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £13,250
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 47
- Rule 70
- Rule 72(2)
- Rule 73
- s.3(2) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.