Case 3313362/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Harlock v Royal Mail Group Ltd & Others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313362/2019
- Decision date
- 11 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Harlock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 22 June 2019, the tribunal gave Mr O Harlock an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with the tribunal’s order of 16 April 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 2 January 2020 was vacated and did not take place. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim in the extracted text; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with an order dated 16 April 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.