Case 3313363/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J P Bateman v PAM Wellbeing Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313363/2022
- Decision date
- 28 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J P Bateman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 January 2023, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out. The stated reason was that the response had no reasonable prospect of success because the respondent had not identified any grounds on which it opposed the claim.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any future hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive liability findings or monetary award are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that the respondent's response was struck out. It does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.