Case 3313375/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Van Heron v Stonegate Pub Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313375/2019
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Van Heron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claims because they were presented out of time. The claims were dismissed on that basis.
The hearing listed for 24 August 2020 was vacated. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claims were presented out of time, and that the claims were dismissed. It does not set out the individual claims in the judgment text; classification reflects the supplied listing category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claims were presented out of time, and that the claims were dismissed. It does not set out the individual claims in the judgment text; classification reflects the supplied listing category. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claims were presented out of time, and that the claims were dismissed. It does not set out the individual claims in the judgment text; classification reflects the supplied listing category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claims were presented out of time, and that the claims were dismissed. It does not set out the individual claims in the judgment text; classification reflects the supplied listing category. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Gender reassignment discrimination | The supplied listing category refers to Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism. The judgment itself does not set out the individual claims; this classification is therefore lower confidence. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.