Case 3313384/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Buzzoni v Watersheds Capital Partners Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3313384/2020
- Decision date
- 9 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Buzzoni
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been received to the claimant’s claim, the tribunal determined the matter under Rule 21. It found that Mr R Buzzoni had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the net sum of £103,550.24.
The tribunal also found that he had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £4,336.25 on that claim. It further recorded that he had not been paid for accrued holiday entitlement, but made no separate award for that period because it was already compensated by the unlawful deductions claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the net sum of £103,550.24. | Upheld | — | £103,550 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £4,336.25. | Upheld | — | £4,336 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was not paid for accrued holiday entitlement, but made no separate award because that period was already compensated by the unlawful deductions award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £107,886
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.