Case 3313396/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Paterson v Kyle Wolstencraft Stone — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313396/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Paterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 March 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 10 January 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The extracted reasons do not record any substantive determination on the merits of the underlying claim, nor any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim in the extracted text. It records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's order dated 10 January 2023 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.