Case 3313400/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance & not represented v Miss G Corby Counsel — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313400/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance & not represented
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Kessassi was employed by Tesco Stores Limited at its Harlesden Stonebridge Express store as a Customer Assistant from 13 November 2018 to 15 May 2021. After early conciliation from 21 November 2023 to 23 November 2023, she presented a claim on 23 November 2023 pursuing disability discrimination, arrears of pay and other payments. The respondent resisted the claim, including on the basis that the complaints were not particularised and were said to be out of time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal did not determine the merits of the disability discrimination complaint. The whole claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and gave no adequate explanation. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal did not determine the merits of the arrears of pay / other payments complaint. The whole claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and gave no adequate explanation. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.