Case 3313407/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A V M Keen v Mountain Healthcare Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3313407/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Members
- Venue
- Norwich
- Panel members
- Ms L Davies, Ms L Salmon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A V M Keen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Norwich between 9 and 12 April 2024 before Employment Judge M Warren with Ms L Davies and Ms L Salmon, considered claims brought by Mrs A V M Keen against Mountain Healthcare Limited. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Mr O Lawrence of Counsel.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The claim of age discrimination was dismissed.
The respondent was ordered to pay total compensation of £19,815.20, comprising an agreed Basic Award of £2,389.88 for unfair dismissal, agreed compensation of £12,094.72 for loss of earnings arising from discrimination, £4,000 for injury to feelings arising from discrimination, and agreed interest of £1,330.60. The tribunal recorded that the recoupment provisions do not apply. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will only follow if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic Award in the agreed sum of £2,389.88 in respect of unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £2,389 |
| Disability discrimination | Agreed loss of earnings arising from discrimination of £12,094.72 plus £4,000 injury to feelings. Interest of £1,330.60 awarded separately at aggregate level. | Upheld | Disability | £16,094 |
| Age discrimination | Claim of age discrimination failed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,815
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,389
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,094
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.