Case 3313417/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Insight CDM and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 3313417/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Insight CDM and Site Safety Limited had been dissolved on 20 August 2019. On that basis, it held that the claim could not proceed because there was no legal entity in existence against which it could be pursued.
No findings were made on the substance of the claimants' underlying employment claims. The judgment was procedural only and did not determine liability, compensation, or any merits issues.
The tribunal stayed the proceedings for 6 months from the date the written judgment was sent to the parties, so that the claimants could apply to have the company restored to the Register of Companies if they wished to continue the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not determine the underlying employment claims on their merits. It found that the respondent had been dissolved on 20 August 2019, so there was no legal entity in existence against which the proceedings could be pursued, and it stayed the proceedings for 6 months to allow an application for restoration to the Register of Companies if the claimants chose to make one. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.