Case 3313422/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Benning v Riddwood Consulting Engineers Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313422/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 6 January 2023, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out. The grounds identified were non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 20 March 2022 and that the case had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Anstis therefore struck out the response.
The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the substantive claims. It strikes out the respondent's response because the respondent failed to comply with the tribunal's order dated 20 March 2022 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.