Case 3313424/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v Kettle Foods Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3313424/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing at Norwich on 12 April 2023 was before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal refused her application for a remote hearing because it was unsupported by medical evidence said to show that she could not attend in person.
The claimant had been employed by Kettle Foods Limited from 3 September 2018 until dismissal on 28 June 2022 for ill-health capability. The tribunal reviewed the history of her absence from June 2021, including chest pain, later references to Covid, stress and anxiety, Occupational Health reports, and her counselling records. It found that by June 2022 her wellbeing scores had reduced and that she had not been prescribed medication for stress or anxiety during the relevant period.
Applying the Equality Act 2010 disability definition, the tribunal accepted that the claimant may have had mild anxiety or stress, but found that the condition was not substantial and was not long term. It concluded that the evidence did not support her assertion that she was unable to leave her house or travel at all, and held that she did not satisfy section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. Her Equality Act claims were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only; the tribunal held that the claimant did not satisfy the section 6 Equality Act 2010 definition of a disabled person, so her Equality Act claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- EAT four questions on disability
- 2010 Guidance on Disability and Codes of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.