Case 3313427/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Wren Seaward v Tyneside Club — 2023
- Case reference
- 3313427/2022
- Decision date
- 24 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- Norwich via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Wren Seaward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich via CVP on 7 June 2023 before Employment Judge Krepski. The claimant, Wren Seaward, did not attend. The respondent, Tyneside Club, was represented by Mr Tidy, solicitor.
Because the claimant failed to attend, the tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not contain any findings on the underlying merits of the claim. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
The written judgment was sent to the parties on 24 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal dismissed the claim because the claimant failed to attend the hearing, pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.