Case 3313456/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nagendra Sarma v Louisa O'brien — 2025
- Case reference
- 3313456/2023
- Decision date
- 3 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nagendra Sarma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made no findings on the substance of the underlying claim. It recorded that, by letter dated 30 January 2025, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 11 November 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Cowen ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any substantive determination of liability.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not comply with the order dated 11 November 2024 and did not actively pursue the claim. By letter dated 30 January 2025 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.