Case 3313467/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ratledge v EMS (Truck & Trailer Parts) Limited and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3313467/2019
- Decision date
- 3 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Dated
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr M Ratledge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings in case 3313467/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr M Ratledge. The judgment names the respondents as EMS (Truck & Trailer Parts) Limited, EMS-FP & S Limited, and Roadlink International Limited.
No substantive findings on liability are set out in the judgment text provided. The document is limited to the procedural disposal of the case, which was by dismissal after withdrawal rather than after determination of the merits.
The judgment is dated 10 February 2020 and was sent to the parties on 3 March 2020. No remedy, award, or legal test is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.